International and constitutional Law
From: Victor Bellomy
Date: 24 Oct 2000
Time: 12:08:43
Remote Name: 209.83.26.171

Comments

International law has been in existence for thousands of years and evolving from the start to present day,

and is the product of the time in which it occurred.. Therefore one can not reverse or rewrite international 

law of 500 hundred years ago to satisfy present day complaints. When the British came to this country, 

they did what international law called for, as well as Spain, France, and others.. 

Right ,wrong or indifference, Indigenous peoples without a seat of government, and who were nomadic,

and not far removed from stone age cultures, were not considered nations or states. 

They held no true ownership of the soil, and were to be incorporated into the conquering society. 

The discoverer had the right to lay a claim to that soil, as well as the annexation of the Indigenous 

peoples, either by annexation conquest or by treating.. It has always been recognized, even unto 

conquering nations that the conqueror other nations today, have the right to govern the conquered, 

by annexation or conquest... and that law still stands today. Who among us has the power to stop a 

super power from excising their authority of that power??.Only in the United States can the conquered 

reign supreme over the conqueror...not by the will of the people, but by the will of one man, 

through the office of the president, by executive order, therefore bypassing the congress.. 

In all reality this is illegal and in unconstitutional, and in conclusion, what are we to do??? 

TUCKER'S CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Here is what Tucker's constitutional law has to say about this subject. 

"It can hardly be maintained that a few hundred thousand savages can claim a perpetual title 

to an entire continent, to be used by them as a theater of nomadic life, without the cultivation of the 

soil or the improvement of its resources for the benefit of mankind, against the claim of crowded

 populations, who, by bringing the methods of civilized life to bear upon this new continent, 

could make the savages circumscribe the area of their occupation and subject that area to the 

methods of civilized life, without abridgment of their natural rights and with really an increase of 

happiness and well being.. The doctrine, sic utere tuo ut non alienum laedes, would compel the 

savage to limit his occupation within an area which would not diminish his happiness, so as that the 

unused domain might be subjected to civilized methods for the benefit of the crowded population of

 the world.. But be this as it may, The doctrine of the rightful possession of the American continent by 

the different British colonies settled upon it has been so long recognized and enforced that it is 

needless to discuss further" As found in tucker page 182, down to mid point, on that page.....

Last changed: October 24, 2000